No sugar-coating.

Tested by people we don't pay.

No tour contracts means no paid endorsements — so independent reviewers keep putting Sugar on launch monitors next to the number one ball in golf. Here's what they found.

On the launch monitor

Video reviews & tests

Weekend Tour Pro review thumbnail: Sugar Soft, Pure and Quad tested head to head
Soft, Pure & Quad — all three, head to head Latest
Weekend Tour Pro · 21 August 2026 — twenty minutes putting the whole range against itself
TXG review thumbnail: the Sugar ball tested against a Pro V1
Pro V1 replacement? // Sugar Ball
TXG · Club Champion — Ian and Mike test it against a Pro V1 on wedge, 7 iron and driver
Sugar ball vs Pro V1 GC Quad performance test thumbnail
Sugar Ball vs Pro V1 — GC Quad performance test
Launch monitor data, side by side
As good as a Pro V1 Sugar ball review thumbnail
As good as a Pro V1? | Sugar Ball review
Independent on-course review
Sugar golf ball competitor to the Pro V1 review thumbnail
Sugar Golf Ball: the competitor to the Pro V1?
Independent review
In writing

What the golf press found

If the goal and mission was to replicate the performance of a Pro V1 — well done. Congratulations, you’ve done it.
TXG · Club Champion
By cutting out the fluff — tour contracts and extra packaging — Sugar sells a ball that performs with the industry leaders at a much lower price.
Plugged In Golf — full review
Buy two of the bulk 27-ball cubes and each ball comes in at $2.37 — a good three-piece urethane golf ball at a good price.
GolfBlogger — full review

More independent testing: MyGolfSpy forum member reviews of the Sugar Pure

Run your own test.

The launch monitor doesn't lie. Neither does your scorecard.

Grab a cube, play a month, and see what you think — that's the only review that matters.

Shop the range →